|
|
|
The Qur'an and Modern Science
Extracts from the video "The Truth"
|
RELIGION
and SCIENCE have always been considered to be twin
sisters by Islam and today at a time when science has taken
great strides, they still continue to be associated. Furthermore,
certain scientific data are used for a better understanding
of the Qur'anic text. In a century where, for many, scientific
truth has dealt a deathblow to religious belief, it is precisely
the discoveries of science that, in an objective examination
of the Islamic Revelation, have highlighted the supernatural
character of various aspects of the Revelation.
After a study which lasted ten years, the famous French
physician Maurice Bucaille adressed the French Academy of
Medicine in 1976 and expressed the complete agreement of
the Qur'an and established findings of modern science. He
presented his study on the existence in the Qur'an of certain
statements concerning physiology and reproduction. His reason
for doing that was that "our knowledge of these disciplines
is such, that it is impossible to explain how a text produced
at the time of the Qur'an could have contained ideas that
have only been discovered in modern times".
Decades later a noted embryologist Keith L. Moore and expert
in his field, upon being presented with the statements made
in the Qur'an regarding the stages of the formation of the
embryo from the mixing of the male and female gametes up
to the embryo's full development remarked "It has been a
pleasure for me to help clarify statements in the Qur'an
about Human Development. It is clear to me that these statements
must have come to Muhammad from God or Allaah because almost
all of this knowledge was not discovered until many centuries
later." Professor Moore presented his findings to scientists
at several conferences. Several Canadian periodicals published
many of Moore's statements and in addition he presented
three television programmes in which he highlighted the
compatibility of modern science with what has been revealed
in the Qur'an 1400 years ago. Consequently, he was asked:
"Does this mean that you believe that the Qur'an is the
word of God?" to which he replied "I find no difficulty
in accepting this."
In fact Professor Moore was so amazed at the accuracy of
the descriptions and the terminology used for the various
stages of the development of the embryo that he modified
his own textbook on the subject. He incorporated all the
relevant Qur'anic passages and authentic statements of the
Prophet Muhammad into his book, The Developing Human:
Clinically oriented embryology with Islamic additions,
which was published by WB Saunders in 1987 and was a standard
university textbook in the United States. The book now contains
passages of the Qur'an and the Hadeeth (verified statements
of the Prophet Muhammad) for every stage of development
and Professor Moore has also adopted the classification
used in the above two sources.
Consider also the statement of Tejatet Tejasen (Professor
at the Dept. of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mei
University, Thailand) after his study on the Qur'an passages
dealing with embryology: "From my studies and what I have
learnt at this conference I believe that everything that
has been recorded in the Qur'an 1400 years ago must be true.
That can be proved the scientific way". Also the statement
of E. Marshal Johnson (Professor and Chairman, Dept. of
Anatomy, Daniel Bough Institute, Thomas Jefferson University,
Philadelphia, USA) when he became aware of such statements
in the Qur'an and investigated them: "The Qur'an describes
not only the development of external form but emphasizes
also the internal stages - the stages inside the embryo
of its creation and development, emphasizing major events
recognized by contemporary science... If I was to transpose
myself into that era, knowing what I do today and describing
things, I could not describe the things that were described...
I see no evidence to refute the concept that this individual
Muhammad had to be developing this information from some
place... so I see nothing in conflict with the concept that
divine intervention was involved..."
Upon being presented with hadeeths (verified statements
of the Prophet Muhammad) concerning dominant and recessive
characteristics Joe Leigh Simpson (Professor of Obstretics
and Gynecology, Northwestern University Medical School,
Chicago, Illinois, USA) said: "... these Hadeeths could
not have been obtained on the basis of the scientific knowledge
that was available at the time of the'writer'... It follows
that not only is there no conflict between genetics and
religion (Islam) but in fact religion (Islam) may guide
science by adding revelation to some of the traditional
scientific approaches... There exist statements in the Qur'an
shown centuries later to be valid which support knowledge
in the Qur'an having been derived from God".
Consider also the statement of T.V.N. Persaud (Professor
and Head, Dept. of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry,
University of Manitoba, Canada): "Muhammad was a very ordinary
man, he couldn't read, didn't know how to write, in fact
he was an illiterate... were talking about 1400 years ago,
you have some illiterate person making profound statements
that are amazingly accurate, of a scientific nature... I
personally can't see how this could be mere chance, there
are too many accuracies and like Dr. Moore I have no difficulty
in my mind reconciling that this is a divine inspiration
or revelation which lead him to these statements".
These are just a number of quotes from the "Scientific
Community" regarding the nature and the origins of the
Qur'an. In fact the Qur'an and Hadeeth do not just talk
about embryology but hundreds of other phenomenon including
the earth and sun being round, spinning around their own
axis and following their own orbits, the origin and formation
of the universe, the two types of seas between which is
a barrier, the role of mountains in stabilising the earths
crust, the formation of milk in cows, the cause of sexual
diseases, the location of pain receptors within the body,
the expansion of the universe, the precise nature of the
water cycle, the change in atmospheric pressure at high
altitudes, the gender of the bee which is responsible for
producing honey (female), the stars consuming themselves
via the combustion of their gases and this being the source
of their light and many more.
Explaining all these statements by chance alone is something
which has been resorted to, surprisingly by those deemed
to be possessors of intellect and erudition. However this
is not tenable as the following demonstration will show.
When you make a guess regarding the true nature of something
(in an accurate and precise manner that is) there are only
two possibilities. Either you are right or wrong. If you
make another guess then you only have one chance in four
of being correct both times. If you make a third guess then
you have one chance in eight of being correct all three
times and so on. The chances of correctly describing, lets
say, ten phenomena are 1 in 1024. Another point to bear
in mind is that the greater the number of things you describe,
the chance of being wrong is greater and thus the risk you
are taking of being discredited gets bigger and bigger.
The Qur'an and the Sunnah (Authentic sayings of the Prophet
(sas)) make statements on literally hundreds of phenomenen
and at the same time openly calls the scientific community
to verify them. If one from the scientific community was
to make hundreds of new claims regarding his particular
field and was then to call all his fellow specialists to
prove him wrong he would know without doubt that he is standing
on an undermined sand cliff which is ready to crumble with
him. How then for the one who makes statements about the
specialities of others?
One will be surprised to learn that such a scientific approach
has been commanded in the Qur'an with the objective of ascertaining
its truthfulness.
Do they not carefully consider (investigate) the Qur'an
or are there locks upon their hearts. [Surah 47:24]
|
Do
they not carefully analyse the Quran. If it
had been from other than Allaah then surely
they would have found many discrepancies therein
[Surah 4:82]
|
So religious (that is Islamic) beliefs are not based
upon blind acceptance as many have generalised to
all religions and thus falsely attributed to the
Qur'an and Islam. This has been the experience of
Europe in the past 3-400 years in which scientific
advancement and its findings were seen as heretical,
its proponents ridiculed and often exiled and tortured.
Islam has never had that experience
It is true that peoples academic capabilities differ
and thus some will be unable to ascertain the truth
of it and therefore may accept it blindly. But again
they have the opportunity to ask the people of knowledge,
those who are in a position to make such a judgement,
like those quoted above. It is from the principles
of wisdom and justice that when you don't know you
don't make a judgement yourself but rather consult
one who is in a position to do so. In fact this
is something Allaah has also commanded: .
|
So
ask the People of Knowledge if you do not
know [Surah 21:7]
|
and
He has also said
|
And
those who have been given Knowledge know
that that which has been revealed to you
from your Lord is the Truth [Surah 34:6]
|
This is a clear proof of the lack of the dependance
upon dogma, superstition and personal experience
and an indication of the obligation to research,
ascertain and to verify in a scientific manner the
credibility of religious (Islamic) belief. Fortunately
there are those who have done exactly that like
Keith Moore and his scientific colleagues but there
are others who have invented lies and slanders in
order to discredit the Qur'an and the Prophet. However
when these lies and slanders are put to the test
scientifically they fail miserably and their irrationality
and bias becomes evident. Some of the common claims
are that Muhammad was possessed or was an eloquent
poet or was a magician or was one who was brainwashed
or was a soothsayer. In fact all of these have been
denied and rebutted in the Qur'an itself in numerous
places and numerous times. It is even more strange
that these were the very same claims made by the
people who belied the Prophet during his lifetime,
and they are the only ones that are resorted to
today. What a great advancement!
|
Nay!
We hurl the Truth against falsehood and
it does smash it's brains and thus it perishes.
And woe be to you for what you describe
(with your tongues) [Surah 21:18]
|
Amjad
Rafiq The Islamic Society University of Essex November
1994.
Note : All quotes have been taken from a video in
which after having been presented with the statements
in the Qur'an and Hadeeth and given the chance to
investigate, the various scientists were questioned
as to their opinion regarding the Qur'an. There
response was recorded live. The video is called
"The Truth" and is available from the Islamic
Society upon request. If you would like to know
more or have any queries about this topic then please
feel free to contact the Islamic Society on Ext.
2019 or if you prefer you are more than welcome
to the Society in the Chaplaincy Centre or drop
us a line via the Students Union Pigeon Holes
Acknowledgment: The source of the text is http://www.maxinet.com/yusuf/yusuf.htm
|
|
|
|
|
|